Star opposes Sarawak's constitutional amendments

 

By: Tony Thien

Malaysiakini

Nov 30, 04 4:55pm


A state opposition leader has described the proposal by the Sarawak government to amend the state constitution to enable the state assembly speaker to act as Yang Di-Pertua Negeri or governor in the event the latter is unable to perform his duties as “one which carries wide implications for Sarawak.”

 

“The proposed amendment (to the state constitution) should be deferred if we seriously consider the long-term interests of Sarawak and Malaysia,” said Dr Patau Rubis, president of the State Reform Party (Star).

 

The speaker need not be acting head of state because there are a lot of qualified retired government officers and respected individuals in the society who can be appointed to the post as had been the practice in the past, he argued.


Dr Patau, a former state assistant minister, said he would not want to speculate on the motive behind such the proposal, but felt the reasons given for it were ‘not good enough’ for
Sarawak and Malaysia.

 

The amendment will be tabled at the State Legislative Assembly sitting on Dec 7 and if and when approved will become effective on Dec 31, 2004.

 

Foregone conclusion

 

There has also been unconfirmed reports that the term, ending next month, of the present head of state Tun Mohammad Salahuddin has either been extended or to be extended by another two years.

 

The present speaker is Mohd Asfia Awang Nassar, a lawyer by training and Chief Minister Abdul Taib Mahmud’s Parti Pesaka Bumiputra Bersatu (PBB) state assemblyperson.

 

The passage of the bill is a foregone conclusion as the state ruling coalition controls all but one of the 62 seats in the assembly. The sole seat is held by DAP’s Chiew Chin Sing (Kidurong).

 

The proposed constitutional amendment is to give powers to the King to make such an appointment. If the speaker is ‘unwilling or unable’ to be appointed acting head of state, then the King will appoint another person after consultation with the chief minister.

The Speaker’s post is normally held in rotation by candidates nominated by the state Barisan Nasional parties. Before Mohd Asfia, the post was held by Song Swee Guan of the Sarawak United People’s Party (Supp).

 

One immediate public reaction is why the state government is getting away from normal practice in advising the King to appoint an acting head of state from among respectable and qualified persons.

 

“We are not short of such persons in our society,” said Dr Patau.

 

Elaborating on his concerns, he explained that “once it is approved and becomes effective, to be a speaker you must be Muslim because, as stipulated in the constitution (as amended in the early 1970s), the governor must be Muslim,” he commented.

 

“Could a non-Muslim become eligible then to be speaker as he is also required to act as governor when the need arises?” he asked. “Or if a Dayak were to be Speaker, does he have to be Muslim?”

 

Drifting further apart

 

Dr Patau, who is campaigning against erosion of native rights, especially on native customary rights land, and corruption in high places, claimed the move was getting further away from what he said were the initial reasons for Malaysia for Muslims and non-Muslims to work together as equal partners.

 

“According to an unwritten agreement (between Dayak and Muslim leaders just prior to the formation of Malaysia and widely published in newspapers at the time), if a Dayak is to be chief minister then the governor should be Muslim or vice versa,” he said.

 

“(The late) Tun (Temenggong) Jugah (anak Barieng) would not have agreed if there has been no such understanding,” Dr Patau asserted, adding that “a great deal of persuasion” was needed to get one-third of the people of Sarawak then who were in favour of the formation of Malaysia but held certain reservations so that two-thirds would support Malaysia. The remaining one-third were not in favour of Malaysia.

 

Hence, the 20-point Inter-Governmental Committee Agreement, including the continued use of English and the special rights and interests of Sarawak was concluded on the formation of Malaysia, he reminded.

 

“It must be remembered the post of the head of state is for everyone whereas the speaker is appointed by the party in power, exclusively to safeguard the interests of the government in power,” Dr Patau pointed out.

Sarawak is said to be first among four Malaysian states (with governors as head of state) – Sarawak, Sabah, Melaka and Penang – to be making such a move.

 

Official interference

 

The Star president also expressed concern over the state government’s move to bring in a new legislation giving it the authority to appoint community chiefs and headmen.

 

He said the move represented ‘official interference’ of what he called native rights to elect their own trusted leaders to safeguard their rights to land, customs and traditions.

 

Dr Patau also said he hoped that it was not a calculated move to further the business interests of some groups by getting rid of any opposition at village level to any intended development in the local area.

 

“Now the politicians (want to) make the decision. The appointment of ketua kaum is to be made on the recommendations of the Resident or District Officer who is directly under the state secretary and the politicians.”

 

He described traditionally-elected community chiefs and headmen as “chief justices for their villages,” standing as “symbols for local justice” as they were regarded as highly-respected individuals in their respective areas.

 

Another move which has drawn flaks from the opposition is a proposal to amend the state constitution to allow state ministers and assistant ministers to take up non-executive positions in companies and corporations in which the state government is a major shareholder.


DAP’s Chiew described the move as ‘a bad one’ as it was unnecessary and that it would not guarantee the office would not be subject to abuse, and that it would go against Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi’s drive against corruption.

 

“State-owned companies and corporations are best left to full-time company directors and professionals to protect the interests of the companies, the government and the state,” Chiew said.

 

Dr Patau feared that it would lead to a proliferation of what he called “politics of patronage and money politics”.