Extracted from Malaysiakini

 

Still labourers, not landowners after 35 years

Claudia Theophilus

 

About 70 Iban families who were resettled from the Kalimantan border during the Malaysia-Indonesia ‘confrontation’ from 1963-1966 are demanding the land titles and compensation promised to them by the Sarawak government of the day.

 

Village chief Nelson Janggai anak Sulau said that, in 1963, the state government ordered over 400 families from two villages to be resettled closer to Miri for security reasons, due to border clashes.


Residents of Lobang Baya and Nanga Jambu Delok in Lubok Antu agreed to move after being told about the necessity to resettle them to a safer place with easy accessibility.


He said the Sarawak Finance Development Corporation (SFDC), which undertook the resettlement, offered each settler a 0.6ha village lot at the Kampung Penempatan Bukit Peninjau oil palm scheme about 50km south of Miri.


“It has been 35 years. Instead of being owners, we’re now only labourers,” he told malaysiakini during a recent visit to
Kuala Lumpur.


He claimed that the Sarawak Land Development Board (LKTS) has since sold the scheme, inclusive of the village and the oil palm plantation, to the Sarawak Plantation Agriculture Development (SPAD).


Malaysiakini has not been able to reach officials at the relevant agencies for comment since yesterday.


Fulfil promise’


According to Nelson, the state Lands and Surveys Superintendent granted a provisional 60-year lease in May 1983 to LKTS for 2,162 hectares of land at nearby Bukit Kisi with a premium of more than RM16,000 and an annual rent of RM5,343.


“Our agreement was with (then) SFDC but the whole scheme has now been taken over by the LKTS and sold off to the SPAD,” he said.


“Instead of being land owners, we’re paid RM8 daily wage or about RM200 a month. How are our families to survive with school-going children? We want the government to revert to the 1970 resettlement agreement and fulfil it.”


He said the villagers had attempted to stop the replanting of oil palm ever since the SPAD took over management of the scheme, but failed.

 

When resettlement began in stages in 1970, he said, the government promised to allocate a four-hectare plot to each settler and issue titles after 12 years.


“But most have left the scheme after becoming confused with what was happening within the state agencies. Some were even given temporary housing by the LKTS and made to sign a separate agreement,” he claimed, adding that his villagers had told him this.


According to the explanatory notes attached to an official circular dated Feb 9,1970 issued by the state development officer on the selection of settlers, land titles would not be issued until “total development cost are recovered”.


However, the settlers could occupy Kampung Bukit Peninjau “in anticipation of titles and will be encouraged to cultivate (the land) themselves in their free time”.


A compensation scheme would be available in cases where settlers have to be removed but “only after the land has been fully developed”, estimated to be four to five years later.


As a means of survival, said Nelson, the remaining villagers have cultivated neighbouring state land, using this for orchards, vegetable farms and banana plantations.


“We want the state government gives us the two plots in replacement of ancestral land that we lost during resettlement.”


However, the Miri district Lands and Surveys Superintendent issued a letter on
June 17, 2003 prohibiting Nelson and the second village chief Asong anak Pitot and all villagers from carrying out any agricultural activity on state land.


“We want what is rightfully ours, that is, we want an equivalent site near our present village to replace the ancestral land we lost during the resettlement,” Nelson added.