Sarawak govt handling NCR issues the wrong way
Tony Thien

 

The large number of legal cases brought by native customary rights (NCR) claimants against Sarawak state authorities and companies issued either with logging permits or oil-palm land leases shows clearly that ‘something, somewhere is gravely wrong with the way the state government is handling the NCR land issue’, an opposition elected representative told the state legislative assembly.

There are about 130 such litigation cases before the courts, Chiew Chin Sing (DAP-Kidurong) said, adding that the seriousness of the issue following growing conflicts on the ground and causing hardships to both natives and investors concerned should be addressed and resolved quickly.

He said the state government had already lost two important cases – the Rumah Nor case at Sekabai, Bintulu and the Kampung Nyalau, Bintulu case where the government had been ordered to pay damages likely to be in the tune of RM70 million when it is assessed by the court eventually.

“Where will the state government find this kind of money to pay? There are over one hundred more cases filed in the court pending hearing and judgment,” he added.

According to the DAP legislator, many of the native lands had their boundaries marked according to the decree of the Rajah via Order No 12 where they were told to identify their boundaries according to the rivers.

“The Land and Survey Department has thus done the composite plan showing distribution of native land 1954. But why is it then that today the department is still issuing provisional leases over these lands to plantation companies and others?’

“I wonder whether corruption is an issue here,” Chiew said, adding that “I am not saying this (corruption) in jest, for I bear in mind that according to the ACA, local councils and the Land and Survey Department are the most corrupt departments.’

Many disputes had arisen following violations of native laws, cultures and traditions.

In order to reduce the problem, he said the government should survey all native lands and issue NCR lands with official documents certifying the natives’ rights over their lands.

He also said compensation of NCR land acquired by the government should be paid according to current market rate and not limited to available crops and properties on the land.

Greenpeace’s statement

On a new law passed in the state assembly several years to survey and register NCR land, Chiew said little had been heard of its progress and the status of the work.

“I have not even heard that a NCR land registry has been put in place. I hope I am wrong in this,” he added.

Chiew believed that if native lands had already been surveyed and issued with titles, conflicts like the Penan bringing the government and timber conglomerate Samling Group to court over logging operations in the Sela’an Linau area could have been avoided.

The case, he added, had caused Greenpeace to release a statement on May17, 2005 in Amsterdam, raising its concerns over the serious gaps in the certification standards of the Malaysian Timber Certification Council (MTCC) among which is the protest by the indigenous people, including the Penan tribe.

“This kind of issue brought up by Greenpeace is not good at all for our timber and timber products overseas and is bad for our state economy,” Chiew warned.